Network connectivity in default and fronto-parietal mode during rest distinguishes asymptomatic patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder

0
  • 1.

    Stiles BM, Fish AF, Vandermause R, Malik AM. The compelling and persistent problem of bipolar disorder disguised as major depressive disorder: an integrative review. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2018; 24: 415-25.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Singh T, Rajput M. Misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder. Psychiatry. 2006; 3: 57-63.

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Menon V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Cogn Sci trends. 2011; 15: 483-506.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Korgaonkar MS, Erlinger M, Breukelaar IA, Boyce P, Hazell P, Antees C, et al. Activation of the amygdala and connectivity to emotional processing distinguish asymptomatic patients with bipolar disorder and unipolar depression. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019; 4: 361-70.

    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Rai S, Griffiths K, Breukelaar IA, Barreiros AR, Chen W, Boyce P, et al. Investigate neural circuitry of emotion regulation to distinguish euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Bipolar disorders. 2021; 23: 284-94.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Townsend J, Altshuler LL. Processing and regulation of emotions in bipolar disorder: a review. Bipolar disorder. 2012; 14: 326-39.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Visted E, Vøllestad J, Nielsen MB, Schanche E. Regulation of emotions in current depression and in remission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. 2018; 9: 756.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Killingsworth MA, Gilbert DT. A wandering spirit is an unhappy spirit. Science. 2010; 330: 932.

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Friston KJ. Functional and efficient connectivity: a review. The brain connects. 2011; 1: 13-36.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • ten.

    Zhan X, Yu R. A Window to the Brain: Advances in Psychiatric fMRI. Biomed Res. Int. 2015; 2015: 12. Item number 542467.

  • 11.

    Martino M, Magioncalda P, Huang Z, Conio B, Piaggio N, Duncan NW, et al. Contrasting patterns of variability in the default mode and sensorimotor networks balance out in bipolar depression and mania. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113: 4824-9.

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Jiang X, Fu S, Yin Z, Kang J, Wang X, Zhou Y et al. Common and distinct neuronal activities in the fronto-parietal network in the first episode of bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: preliminary results from a follow-up study with resting fMRI. J Affect Disorder. 2020; 260: 653-9.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Pang Y, Chen H, Wang Y, Long Z, He Z, Zhang H, et al. Transdiagnostic and diagnostic-specific dynamic functional connectivity anchored in the right anterior insula in major depressive disorder and bipolar depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018; 85: 7-15.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Lois G, Linke J, Wessa M. Altered functional connectivity between emotional and cognitive resting state networks in bipolar euthymic patients I. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9:10.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Lopez-Larson MP, Shah LM, Weeks HR, King JB, Mallik AK, Yurgelun-Todd DA, et al. Abnormal functional connectivity between default networks and salience networks in pediatric bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2017; 2: 85-93.

    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Goya-Maldonado R, Brodmann K, Keil M, Trost S, Dechent P, Gruber O. Differentiate unipolar and bipolar depression by alterations in large-scale brain networks. Hum Brain Map. 2016; 37: 808-18.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Ellard KK, Zimmerman JP, Kaur N, Van Dijk KR, Roffman JL, Nierenberg AA. et al. Functional connectivity between the anterior insula and key nodes of the executive fronto-parietal and salience control networks distinguishes bipolar depression from unipolar depression and healthy control subjects. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018; 3: 473-84.

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Liu Y, Wu X, Zhang J, Guo X, Long Z, Yao L. Modified efficient connectivity model in the default mode network between bipolar and unipolar depression based on resting fMRI. J Affect Disorder. 2015; 182: 8-11.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Lema YY, Gamo NJ, Yang K, Ishizuka K. Trait and state biomarkers for psychiatric disorders: importance of infrastructure in bridging the gap between basic and clinical research and industry. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018; 72: 482–89.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Hamilton M. A Depression Rating Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960; 23: 56-62.

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Brother J Psychiatry. 1978; 133: 429-35.

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The Structure of Negative Emotional States: Comparison of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS) with Beck’s Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33: 335-43.

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A. Conn: A functional connectivity toolkit for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. The brain connects. 2012; 2: 125-41.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Favre P, Polosan M, Pichat C, Bougerol T, Baciu M. Brain correlates of the treatment of abnormal emotional conflicts in euthymic bipolar patients: a functional MRI study. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10: e0134961.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 25.

    Favre P, Baciu M, Pichat C, Bougerol T, Polosan M. fMRI evidence of abnormal functional connectivity at rest in euthymic bipolar patients. J Affect Disorder. 2014; 165: 182-9.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 26.

    Mayberg HS. Limbic-cortical dysregulation: a proposed model of depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997; 9: 471-81.

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 27.

    Patents WC, Price JL, Simpson JR, Todd RD, Reich T, Vannier M. et al. Subgenual anomalies of the prefrontal cortex in mood disorders. Nature. 1997; 386: 824-7.

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Greicius MD, Flores BH, Menon V, Glover GH, Solvason HB, Kenna H. et al. Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from the subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. BiolPsychiatry. 2007; 62: 429-37.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 29.

    Korgaonkar MS, Grieve SM, Etkin A, Koslow SH, Williams LM. Using standardized fMRI protocols to identify patterns of prefrontal circuit deregulation that are common and specific to cognitive and emotional tasks in major depressive disorder: results from the first wave of the iSPOT-D study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013; 38: 863–71.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 30.

    Kazemi R, Rostami R, Khomami S, Baghdadi G, Rezaei M, Hata M, et al. Bilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation on DLPFC alters resting state networks and cognitive function in patients with bipolar depression. Before Hum Neurosci. 2018; 12: 356.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 31.

    Liston C, Chen AC, Zebley BD, Drysdale AT, Gordon R, Leuchter B. et al. Default mode network mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. BiolPsychiatry. 2014; 76: 517–26.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 32.

    Michael N, Erfurth A. Treatment of bipolar mania with right prefrontal rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Affect Disorder. 2004; 78: 253-7.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 33.

    Saba G, Rocamora JF, Kalalou K, Benadhira R, Plaze M, Lipski H, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as adjunct therapy in the treatment of mania: a case series of eight patients. Psychiatry Res. 2004 ; 128: 199-202.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 34.

    Roberts G, Green MJ, Breakspear M, McCormack C, Frankland A, Wright A, et al. Reduced activation of the inferior frontal gyrus during inhibition of the response to emotional stimuli in youth at high risk for bipolar disorder. BiolPsychiatry. 2013; 74: 55-61.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Zhang L, Li W, Wang L, Bai T, Ji GJ, Wang K et al. Altered functional connectivity of subregions of the right inferior frontal gyrus in bipolar disorder: a resting fMRI study. J Affect Disorder. 2020; 272: 58-65.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 36.

    Manoliu A, Meng C, Brandl F, Doll A, Tahmasian M, Scherr M, et al. Insular dysfunction within the salience network is associated with symptom severity and aberrant inter-network connectivity in major depressive disorder. Before Hum Neurosci. 2014; 7: 930.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 37.

    Yuen GS, Gunning ‐ Dixon FM, Hoptman MJ, AbdelMalak B, McGovern AR, Seirup JK. et al. The salience network in apathy in late depression. Int J Geriatr psychiatry. 2014; 29: 1116–24.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 38.

    Malhi GS, Lagopoulos J, Sachdev PS, Ivanovski B, Shnier R. A functional emotional Stroop MRI study in euthymic bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorder. 2005; 7: 58-69.

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 39.

    Malhi GS, Tanious M, Das P, Coulston CM, Berk M. Potential Mechanisms of Action of Lithium in Bipolar Disorder. Curr Underst CNS Drugs. 2013; 27: 135-53.

    Item

    Google Scholar


  • Source link

    Leave A Reply

    Your email address will not be published.